WP2 B2

 After World War II, the federal government determined that the best way to improve the country was to invest heavily in the highway system. Early in urban development African Americans were put into small corners of cities, the least desirable areas that no white person wanted to live in. These neighborhoods were targeted as urban blight and removed as the government subsidized slum clearance and urban renewal. This article explains how the “separate but equal” decision made in Plessy v. Ferguson led to the government allowing and even encouraging redlining and segregating African Americans due to the subsidies provided to build highways as urban renewal. City leaders targeted African American communities to be destroyed to build these highways which contributed to the development of the suburbs and how since white taxpayers left city centers the city couldn’t provide for the African Americans left who didn’t have the money to take care of themselves. Ultimately cities should tear down the obstructive and racist highways that have destroyed urban centers across the country.




Ware, Leland. “Plessy’s Legacy: The Government’s Role in the Development and Perpetuation of Segregated Neighborhoods.” RSF : Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, Russell Sage Foundation, 2021, pp. 92–109, https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2021.7.1.06.


Comments

  1. michaelhuangwrit150April 29, 2022 at 8:36 AM

    I think tearing down highways is a little too difficult and counterproductive to do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. michaelhuangwrit150April 29, 2022 at 5:35 PM

      You might want to research how governments have handled this situation in the past.

      Delete
  2. Thomas AnMay 3, 2022 at 4:20 PM

    Tearing it down could be viable but also consider other solutions to help give your argument layers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Project 1 Blog 1

Image
I'll be writing about the character Baljeet from the TV show Phineas and Ferb . Baljeet is an Indian immigrant living in Danville with the titular characters who go on wacky adventures every day of summer vacation by building crazy gadgets. Baljeet is very focused on grades, as he has received straight As and has only gotten one A- as the worst grade of his life. He's even described a failed math test as "the scariest thing known to man". And to top it all off, in The Baljeatles , where Baljeet is stressing about getting a good grade in Summer Rocks, he ends up singing a song called "Somebody Give Me a Grade", all about asking for an A for the camp.   "Somebody Give Me a Grade"   Baljeet represents the "Smart Asian" stereotype, with his character so focused on grades. This stereotype implies that all Asians, specifically Asian-Americans, are good at academics such as math and science. This stereotype is harmful because it places undue exp
Read more

Project 1 Blog 2

Image
There are plenty of ways for Baljeet to be changed. I think the main one is his focus on grades, which doesn't do much within the plot of the show except for a couple episodes. Outside of that, it's mostly used for jokes at Baljeet's expense. When the character was first introduced, he was the nerd that was bullied by Buford, getting wedgies and swirlies for comedic effect. However, as the show progressed, this relationship generally changed to a more true friendship without the bullying. If we remove Baljeet’s obsession with his grades, which was done in later seasons of the show, we can begin Baljeet’s story as an intelligent person with friends, not as the stereotypical “smart” Asian immigrant. This in addition to removing the bully/nerd relationship between Baljeet and Buford will make Baljeet’s character a much better character and no longer representative of the smart Asian stereotype.  Buford giving Baljeet a wedgie.
Read more

Final Blog

The past 15 weeks have been a journey. Pretending that I enjoyed this class wouldn't be fair to either myself or the person reading this either. I was here for the requirement and it felt like everyone else was as well. The collaboration was limited and not very effective and the self-publishing was thoroughly useless. Nobody commented anywhere close to on-time, in fact, the only comment I received before the last week of class was about some messed-up formatting of one of my blog posts. What I learned was only reinforcements of what I already knew: I'm a solid writer and I hate this kind of writing. This stuff won't be helpful because I'm not going to become an academic, nobody likes writing it, nobody likes reading it, and it just felt like a slog to write bloated papers without any passion behind them. My advice to future students is to make sure that you at least try to write about something you're passionate about because that will help make it more bearable.
Read more