I found these resources by searching for public health databases on USC Libraries. There were a lot to choose from so I tried to pull from a mix of global databases, like the World Health Organization, and local resources like the Los Angeles Department of Public Health. After finding these databases I searched using keywords like transgender, public health, and healthcare. These terms are often associated with plenty of issues and so it was easy to locate specific articles and resources that detailed a variety of issues that transgender individuals face. One article in particular that I think will be extremely helpful will be “Breaking down barriers to healthcare access for transgender people in Argentina” as it provides not just looks at specific issues that transgender people face but also individual accounts from people directly affected by access or lack thereof to gender-affirming healthcare. Another useful resource is data from the LADPH on the disproportionate impact on tr...
The past 15 weeks have been a journey. Pretending that I enjoyed this class wouldn't be fair to either myself or the person reading this either. I was here for the requirement and it felt like everyone else was as well. The collaboration was limited and not very effective and the self-publishing was thoroughly useless. Nobody commented anywhere close to on-time, in fact, the only comment I received before the last week of class was about some messed-up formatting of one of my blog posts. What I learned was only reinforcements of what I already knew: I'm a solid writer and I hate this kind of writing. This stuff won't be helpful because I'm not going to become an academic, nobody likes writing it, nobody likes reading it, and it just felt like a slog to write bloated papers without any passion behind them. My advice to future students is to make sure that you at least try to write about something you're passionate about because that will help make it more bearable.
After World War II, the federal government determined that the best way to improve the country was to invest heavily in the highway system. Early in urban development African Americans were put into small corners of cities, the least desirable areas that no white person wanted to live in. These neighborhoods were targeted as urban blight and removed as the government subsidized slum clearance and urban renewal. This article explains how the “separate but equal” decision made in Plessy v. Ferguson led to the government allowing and even encouraging redlining and segregating African Americans due to the subsidies provided to build highways as urban renewal. City leaders targeted African American communities to be destroyed to build these highways which contributed to the development of the suburbs and how since white taxpayers left city centers the city couldn’t provide for the African Americans left who didn’t have the money to take care of themselves. Ultimately cities should tear...
Comments
Post a Comment