The past 15 weeks have been a journey. Pretending that I enjoyed this class wouldn't be fair to either myself or the person reading this either. I was here for the requirement and it felt like everyone else was as well. The collaboration was limited and not very effective and the self-publishing was thoroughly useless. Nobody commented anywhere close to on-time, in fact, the only comment I received before the last week of class was about some messed-up formatting of one of my blog posts. What I learned was only reinforcements of what I already knew: I'm a solid writer and I hate this kind of writing. This stuff won't be helpful because I'm not going to become an academic, nobody likes writing it, nobody likes reading it, and it just felt like a slog to write bloated papers without any passion behind them. My advice to future students is to make sure that you at least try to write about something you're passionate about because that will help make it more bearable.
After World War II, the federal government determined that the best way to improve the country was to invest heavily in the highway system. Early in urban development African Americans were put into small corners of cities, the least desirable areas that no white person wanted to live in. These neighborhoods were targeted as urban blight and removed as the government subsidized slum clearance and urban renewal. This article explains how the “separate but equal” decision made in Plessy v. Ferguson led to the government allowing and even encouraging redlining and segregating African Americans due to the subsidies provided to build highways as urban renewal. City leaders targeted African American communities to be destroyed to build these highways which contributed to the development of the suburbs and how since white taxpayers left city centers the city couldn’t provide for the African Americans left who didn’t have the money to take care of themselves. Ultimately cities should tear...
This source is a resolution from the North Carolina Democratic Party that states the party’s role in inciting and organizing the riot that overthrew the government in 1898. The source is obviously a good one because it comes directly from the Party after a report on the 1898 race riot conducted by Wilmington. The resolution also acknowledges and distances the party from the actions taken by the people in charge back then and “celebrates its role in making the political process more inclusive for African Americans in the 20th Century and honors the actions of each modern Democratic President and Governor, all of whom made significant strides toward desegregation”. I think this source is a good one to use because it explains what happened, acknowledges the wrong that was done, and proposes solutions to improve the lives of those affected. It even highlights how this event wasn't really known about until the Wilmington Race Riot Commission was established in 2000. https://www.proques...
Comments
Post a Comment